With a considerable amount of nonpension legislation expected from
the Democratic leadership within the first 100 hours of the new
Congress, action on pensions is expected to be limited to oversight
and a technical corrections bill to the 2006 pension reform law.
Incoming Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.)
told BNA through an aide Dec. 18 that the technical corrections bill
to the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (Pub. L. No. 109-280; 159 PBD,
8/18/06; 33 BPR 1985, 8/22/06) is expected to be limited to true
corrections but confirmed there is some congressional interest in
expanding or modifying certain provisions. Three such targets include
airline pension funding relief, tax code Section 420 transfers of
retiree health benefits, and the treatment of Indian tribal government
plans.
Baucus also is expected to reintroduce his Savings Competitiveness
Act (S. 2431); push to extend payroll deduction retirement savings to
workers without employer-sponsored retirement plans; and seek to
establish Young Saver's Accounts, which would allow parents to start
Roth-style individual retirement accounts for their
children.
House Financial Services Committee.
Executive compensation may prove to be an irresistible topic for
congressional hearings in 2007, with recent news of several
high-profile “golden parachute” arrangements for exiting
corporate executives. Incoming House Financial Services Committee
Chairman Barney Frank (D-Mass.) told the National Press Club in a Jan.
3 speech of his plans to introduce legislation aimed at increasing the
ability of shareholders to vote their approval on corporate
executive's pay and benefits. “And we're going to try to work
out the details, including what happens if they [shareholders] were to
vote no,” he added.
Referring to the independent, nongovernmental Financial Services
Authority that regulates the United Kingdom's financial services
industry, Frank expressed interest in providing American shareholders
similar flexibility and “more adequate checks” on
executive pay when boards of directors fall short in their oversight
authority. He said the Securities and Exchange Commission made real
gains in requiring corporations to be more open about what kind of
compensation they are paying their executives--including stock options
and retirement packages--and what happens if there's a change in the
corporation.
“By the way, this compensation for CEOs, it's not just a
matter of envy. It has reached a point where it has some macroeconomic
significance,” Frank added.
Citing economic analyses, Frank said the figures have shown that
the percentage of profit of the top 1,500 corporations that is paid to
compensate the top three company officials has reached almost 10
percent.
“We're talking, now, about significant numbers,” Frank
said. “When Lee Raymond gets $400 million when he leaves
ExxonMobil, and the pension [fund] is shorted, … we're not just
talking about envy,” he said.
House Education and Labor Committee.
Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.), incoming chairman of the House
Education and Labor Committee, has said he would like to examine how
well Section 401(k) defined compensation plans are working, Thomas
Kiley, communications director for the Democrats on the committee,
told BNA Dec. 19.
Miller and several other Democrats have expressed concern about the
conditions under which a pension fiduciary's selection and monitoring
of default investments for individuals may limit fiduciary liability
under the Department of Labor's proposed rule on automatic enrollment
and default investments of Section 401(k) funds, according to
Kiley.
Miller, who voted against the Pension Protection Act, expressed
broader concerns to reporters after a Dec. 12 news conference that
certain workers stood to lose greatly if their workplace pension plans
were allowed to terminate. He said he wanted to exhaust all other
possibilities before allowing companies to take their underfunded
plans to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation for termination.
Miller said that he would exercise the committee's oversight
functions to ensure that the stewardship for worker and job
protections was operating at the highest standards.
By way of example, he cited his release of a Government
Accountability Office study he requested, Private Pensions: Changes
Needed to Provide 401(k) Plan Participants and the Department of Labor
Better Information on Fees (GAO-07-21), which recommended changes
to the defined contribution plan system so that participants and the
Labor Department would have increased disclosure of information on
fees charged to sponsors and participants of tax code Section 401(k)
plans (229 PBD, 12/1/06; 33 BPR 2812, 12/5/06).
By Sheila R. Cherry